上古音芻議

龍宇純

    本文論漢語上古音聲韻系統,大體針對李方桂先生〈上古音研究〉有所商略。壹節論單一聲母及介音,主張:(1) 取消圓脣聲母,仍以開合兩分。(2) 據中古四個等,區分上古為甲、乙、丙、丁四韻類,甲類無介音,其餘分別具rji介音,取消rj複合介音的構擬。(3) 聲母計有幫p、滂ph、並bh、明m、端t、透th、定dh、泥n、來l、見k、溪kh、群gh、疑N 、精ts、清tsh、從dzh、心s、邪z、影/ 、曉h 、匣ú 二十一個,並四類韻俱全。照、穿、床之二等出於精、清、從,三等絕大部分出於帶sz複母(或詞頭)的端、透、定,小部分亦出於精、清、從;審禪則無論為二等為三等,均分別出於心、邪。日母出於帶s複母(或詞頭)的泥,喻四則本讀z ú 複母。貳節論上古韻部及擬音,主張:(1) 古韻以分二十二部最為合適,陰與入之分不若其合。(2) 受方言影響,音有正有變,不必凡字於周代只有隸屬一個韻部的讀音,亦不必任何異音都要求其音變條件。(3) 陰聲字不具塞音尾,歌部則獨具韻尾r,其情形如同國語之兒化。(4) 宵部陰聲原是談部的陰聲,其後始脫離了陰陽關係,其入聲亦自葉部分出;侵緝原亦有陰聲,今則混入了幽。(5) 舉出四十餘組自幽部轉讀入微文部字例,證實上古陰聲本不具gd韻尾。

關鍵詞:上古音 漢語音韻

 

Studies on Archaic Chinese Phonology

Yu-chun Lung

Department of Chinese Literature, Tunghai University

    This paper is concerned with the reconstruction of Archaic Chinese phonology, mainly with that proposed by late professor Fang-kuei Li in the 1970s. Part one discusses initials and medials, and suggests that: (1) there is no need for labial-velars, instead the kai-he dichotomy should be maintained as a part of rime; (2) there are four classes of rimes: A, B, C, and D; while A rimes lack any medial, B, C, D ones get -*r-, -*j-, -*i- as their medial element respectively; and it turns out that the combination of -*rj- could be removed; (3) there are 21 simple initials, namely: *p-, *ph-, *bh-, *m-, *t-, *th-, *dh-, *n-, *l-, *k-, *kh-, *gh-, *N -, *ts-, *tsh-, *dzh-, *s-, *z-, */ -, *h-, *ú -, and they can appear with all classes of rimes. The alveolo-palatal affricates (Zhao, Chuan, Chuang) with -grade in Ancient Chinese came from *ts-, *tsh-, *s-; while the same ones with -grade derived from *t-, *th-, *dh- with prefixes *s- or *z- for the most part and from simple *ts-, *tsh-, *dzh- also in a few cases. The alveolo-palatal fricatives (Shen, Chan) came from *s-, *z- respectively; and the corresponding nasal (Zhi) derived again from prefix *s- plus dental nasal *n. The zero initial (Yu-si) of Ancient Chinese originated from consonant cluster *zú -.

    Part two deals with the rime categories and concludes that: (1) the 22-category system is preferable; (2) by considering dialect interference, the requirement that each single word should be classified into only one rime-category is abandoned; (3) words belonging to Yin-sheng rime-categories bear no consonant endings with exceptions of those from Ge category, which has -*r as its ending, a case quite similar to the -r suffixation of Mandarin Chinese; (4) during the pre-Archaic period, words of Xiao category, both Yin-sheng and Ru-sheng, are parts of Tan category; similarly, the original corresponding Yin-sheng words of Qin and Qi categories also merged with You category in Archaic Chinese; (5) the claim that endings -*g or -*d do not exist in any Yin-sheng rimes can be justified again by more than forty pieces of evidence exemplified in this paper.

Keywords: Archaic Chinese, Ancient Chinese